I recently updated my tired 3.9 to a new 4.6. Running around town and at idle, the temp is fine (never over 200). However, on long climbs at freeway speeds, I creep up into the 220-230 range and it's making me a bit nervous, so I'd like to beef up the cooling system. I thought I'd post and see what others have done.
I retained the V-Belt setup and still have a 1.4 T-case (so I'm running about 3k RPM at freeway speeds). The radiator seems to be working OK. I've replaced the temp gauge with a VDO and VDO sender. I've confirmed it's readings. My two front electric fans are working fine and run continuously when the temp is >205.
I figure I've got three areas of enhancement: radiator, fan, cowling.
My fan is the original 7-blade. Does anybody know which 11-blade part is a bolt on? I've found two 11-blade part numbers: ETC1275 and ERR3439. The blade on my 97 D-90 is 11 and the cowling (ESR3226/ESR2847) looks a bit better designed. Anybody know if that'll bolt on (doesn't looks like it)?
I can't help with the fan question but when I installed the 4.6 in my 110, I used an after-market external oil cooler instead if the one built into the radiator. I think it really helps to get that extra heat out of the radiator. I have no temp. problems at all even when towing heavy loads.
Update: I just *thought* the radiator was OK. I pulled it anyway and sent it to the radiator shop. 2/3 plugged! It's definitely better so far. Real test will be some hills at speed (i.e. my drive home).
Rod, Pendy's fixed flex fan was definitely in the back of my mind. You're a mind reader. I may take you up on that, but let me get some more miles on it first; especially with the "new" radiator. Thanks for the offer!
Plugging in a 4.2 ROM this weekend.
Mike, thanks for the data point. It's good to know that the stock cooling system is capable. Are you still running a 1.4 Tcase?
I bought it...I don't mind the holes- just replaced all the gauges with VDO units figuring that there was something up with the old temp gauge or sender. Sure enough, the temp sits right at 200 or below. I can live with that...
-Tim
I'm running a 1.2 t-case. The 4.6 has so much torque that I am very happy with the combo, even when towing a tractor and bush-hog...but then again I only deal with the Blue Ridge Mtns where I am.
With our altitude and hills, stick with the 1.4. The fact that Rob built it just adds to the decision. Congrats on the 110 running well. I'd still get the manifolds. Mark
Yah, that's what I'm thinkin as well. Still looking at the manifolds and perhaps a 4 row radiator rebuild. But as she's running cooler now, that can wait until next summer. Done spending money (for now, of course ). Thanks Mark!
------ Follow up post added October 8th, 2010 01:37 PM ------
I'm running a 1.2 t-case. The 4.6 has so much torque that I am very happy with the combo, even when towing a tractor and bush-hog...but then again I only deal with the Blue Ridge Mtns where I am.
Good to know. Interesting side note: I've had my 110 for about 5 years and always assumed it was a 1.4. When Rob rebuilt it, I found out it was a later LT230 and a 1.2! He put it back right, of course. A 3.9 and a 1.2. No wonder I couldn't get out of my own way.
Popped in a 4.2 ROM today. Definitely seems to be snappier. Rod, if you're still running the 3.9 ROM, give me a call. I've got extras and it's not even a half a beer job.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Defender Source Forum
1M posts
24K members
Since 2003
A forum community dedicated to Land Rover Defender owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, overland, classifieds, modifications, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!