The most "makes sense" explanation for the end of the current Defender - Page 2 - Defender Source
Defender Source  

Go Back   Defender Source > Non-Technical Discussions > Misc. Chit-Chat


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old January 28th, 2016, 12:27 PM
roverman2010's Avatar
roverman2010
Status: Offline
John
1985 LR 90 200Tdi
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Galveston Island, NearTexas
Posts: 2,322
Registry
The only one I have ever sat in seemed to me that the steering wheel was closer than that my 90's found the cabin was more cramped than the LR. Maybe it's the 15.5"wheel I have fitted?
__________________
Edward Teach is the Blackbeard, and is a member of the Birmabright Brotherhood.

Still looking for that place where I can carry a paddle and get asked what's that.

JnK Services
FC101 GS FFR
57 LR 88" SXF 858
85 LR90
95 D1 Tdi
05 D3 HSE
97 XK8 BRG FHC For Sale
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #22  
Old January 28th, 2016, 12:53 PM
xjahx's Avatar
xjahx
Status: Online
JAH
'93 NAS 110, '94 NAS ST, '85 90 PU
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: MVY, ACK
Posts: 473
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elbee View Post
Mercedes is looking to come out with a 4 door pickup truck. So maybe LR will join them and secede the slightly lower priced class to jeep and toyota tacomas/hiluxes
The Defender was always a tier above the Wrangler in regard to MSRP.
-1994 Wrangler MSRP - 15-22k
-1994 Defender 90 MSRP - 28k ST

Build a true off road oriented vehicle, price it at 60-75k, and you will remain 20k over the Rubicon and 40k below the Gwagen. We will be disappointed, as I suspect Doug's H2 comparison will be more accurate than a parallel to what Mercedes or Jeep are offering currently. Damn shame.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old January 28th, 2016, 01:17 PM
don's Avatar
don
Status: Offline
Don Bunnell
'86 110 3dr ST
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rumson, NJ
Posts: 4,271
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Douglas View Post
My take, and I'm probably completely wrong, is that the business model being used has already ceded the minimalist/offroad market to Jeep and Toyota and is aimed @ the more upscale buyer/ "overlander" demographic. I haven't followed the spy articles about what the new truck might be but I'd bet it will be built on the same platform as one of the other models with simply a different design that pays some homage to the predecessor. Kind of like how the H2 was built on a Tahoe platform but meant to look a little like an H1. Its just not profitable anymore to build vehicles the way the defender was built. Again probably wrong, but I think the values for this truck will continue to rise as supply falls. I do hope some cottage industry types take up making the parts for the trucks. We have taken the nto/new take off parts like tdci doors and bulkheads and seats for granted, that's over. Then again if TATA starts building them in India as you guys said in the other thread, game on, containers of NTO parts from India ! Meeting up in Chesapeake Virginia @ Big Ugly Brewery with forum members, Robert the Davis, Mark Garrenton, Rick Newman, and Trey to raise a pint to the day tomorrow. Anyone interested in joining the fellowship is welcome.
Agree

It makes sense that JLR will use an existing platform like the LR4 or upcoming LR5. It will be great on and off road, quiet, and smooth. All JLR has to do is make a "cool looking Defender" top and they will sell. But...I feel like the Defender roots will be lost.

Like others have said before JLR should split Land Rover and Range Rover. I think the current line up for Range Rover is good and they seem to be doing well with it. And I think the new Defender could work well under the RR umbrella.

But they could be doing battle against Jeep and Toyota and even Chevy/Ford/Dodge in mid trucks. They could split off Land Rover and do this:

- make them in India
- 3 models: Defender (or maybe go back to Series nomenclature and have RR use Defender), Discovery (mid size SUV rig) and FC (mid size truck/van)
- one ladder frame but top body could have a bunch of configurations ala RRC, Disco 1, Defender
- work with smaller off road builders (like Rogue and their horizontal/cantilever coil over design) and come up with a simple but strong suspension and axle design. In this day and age guys like Buck are coming up with some great stuff in small shops.
- if possible partner with GM for engines and drivetrains - why the need to design a powerplant when there are so many good ones available "on the shelf"
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #24  
Old January 28th, 2016, 01:21 PM
Red90's Avatar
Red90
Status: Online
John B.
1991 Defender 90, 200TDI
Site Team
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,228
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by xjahx View Post
The Defender was always a tier above the Wrangler in regard to MSRP
I'm pretty sure current pricing is about the same in markets where they are both sold.

It would be easy for LR to make a modern Defender that retained proper off road ability, be better than a Wrangler and at the same price point. They could make a tone of money and sell a lot more than the current Defender without making a dent in the wrangler sales. This would not only help the sales of the (new) Defender, but would boost sales across the line as it gives creed to the brand.

But, LR does not want to do that and will not try.
__________________
Pissing people off on the "net" since 1983.

Land Rover. Turning owners into mechanics since 1948.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old January 28th, 2016, 01:28 PM
CDN38's Avatar
CDN38
Status: Offline
Scott Pelly
2000 110 TD5
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 950
Registry
My 2 cents...

It will be built on the yet to be introduced Discovery replacement platform

Top price point will be - an upscale "SUV" type model (we will see it here).

Bottom price point will be - scaled down "Utility" model for commercial applications (we won't see it here).
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old January 28th, 2016, 04:42 PM
rover4x4's Avatar
rover4x4
Status: Offline
Phillip
1995 SW #487/500
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Old North State
Posts: 7,522
Registry
i figure jeeps are built cheap to fuel the aftermarket. folks go out and buy thousands accessories from xyzabc aftermarket jeep vendors, the list goes on for days rovers have thier shortcomings jeeps are garbage period
__________________
Poor gas mileage gets you to the best places on earth
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Defender Source > Non-Technical Discussions > Misc. Chit-Chat

Tags
defender

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ULR and Sense of Adventure atlcruiser The Vendors Loft 4 November 6th, 2014 10:31 PM
P1193 Code Explanation Videoguy Defender Technical Discussions 1 April 14th, 2014 11:30 PM
Who makes this brushguard? "Kut"?? BEIS Misc. Chit-Chat 5 May 10th, 2013 03:33 PM
landrover.co.uk sense of humor ini88 Misc. Chit-Chat 4 May 14th, 2008 11:54 AM
This problem makes no sense.. sflash868 Defender Technical Discussions 8 July 31st, 2007 02:54 PM

» Defender Registry

Domino

Tripod

TIT

SaltyDog
Add your Defender

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Copyright