Series III, IIA 109 Differences - Defender Source
Defender Source  

Go Back   Defender Source > Non-Technical Discussions > Misc. Chit-Chat

Join the Defender Source Community Today

Thread Tools
Old September 17th, 2007, 11:26 AM
Status: Offline
zach smith
1995 d 90
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atl, GA
Posts: 9
Question Series III, IIA 109 Differences

I have been considering a down grade from a D-90 to series 109. One, for more cargo area, two they're a lot less exspensive and three I wont' have to worry about resale value when it gets a little torn up. So I guess my Question is what are the differences between a Series IIIand the IIa, Which would make better for a daily driver? and what are somethings to look for besides obvious rust issues and the need for Fairley Overdrive.

Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 11:35 AM
KevinNY's Avatar
Status: Offline
Kevin Buckley
1973 coiler
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Guilderland,NY
Posts: 1,462
Series III has a full syncro gearbox.

'73 SeriesIII coiler,"The Goat", Daihatsu 2.8TD,Santana,Ashcroft,ARB's,etc., now SOLD
Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 12:41 PM
Status: Offline
1966 S2a 88" | 2006 LR3
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Caldwell, NJ
Posts: 1,050
Series III has a plastic front grill... headlights were all mounted on the wings (Series IIa's had them in either location) .. fascia and instruments are different. there is a plastic dash..

Series III would probably make a better daily driver, if nothing else for the fact that the gearbox is full syncro, so no need to double clutch.
1966 Series IIa "Olive"
2001 Discovery II
2006 LR3 HSE7

Past: 1994 Defender 90 #416, 2001 Discovery II
Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 03:55 PM
wineryrover's Avatar
Status: Offline
D90, SIII, LR3 & DII
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Napa, CA
Posts: 42
If you haven't already driven a few series trucks, make sure you do. There is a big difference in daily driving a 90 and a series.
Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 05:46 PM
Status: Offline
Edward Hartman
1997 D-90
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Courtland, Virginia, USA
Posts: 140
Power steering! The series rovers are a lot more spartan than a d-90.

I owned a S3 Lightweight for 2 years and enjoyed the hell out of it, but it was for weekends only not a daily driver. Loud, yes, cold?, depending on the outside temp, and drafty.

All Land Rovers have positives and negatives. IMHO, you should keep the D-90, and get a series truck to toy around with.
Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2007, 08:57 AM
Antichrist's Avatar
Status: Offline
Tom Rowe
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA USA
Posts: 1,287
I drove Series Rovers as daily drivers (it's all I owned) from the mid 70's until 2001 when I got my '95 Discovery (because my then wife wouldn't let the kids ride in my Air Portable). All over the east coast and midwest. They aren't that bad as daily drivers.
But I do agree you should take a long drive in one before deciding. They are an entirely different mindset.
Tom Rowe
Atlanta, GA

Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck
in places even more inaccessible.

62 88 Regular
67 109 6cyl NADA x2
74 Lightweight - The Antichrist
95 DI 5-speed
95 D90 5-speed
97 D1 Automatic
Reply With Quote
Old September 19th, 2007, 04:46 PM
stevewhitaker's Avatar
Status: Offline
Stephen Whitaker
1994 D-90
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bruceville, Indiana
Posts: 145
I go along with Tom. My primary vehicle from 1970 until 1998 was a 1961 Series IIA 109 my family had owned since new (I am restoring it now, I think). It has drum brakes, no power steering nor servo assist for the brakes. The stock gearbox is fine, but lacks synchros in 1st and 2nd, which means you double-clutch (not a problem once you get the hang of it). If totally stock, it is slow (I mean really, really slow) on road, but awesome offroad. I stuck 15 guys in it (not all on seats) while in college, so it can haul quite a bit despite being only a little longer than a Volkswagen. The turning radius is about 5 city blocks, but you learn to adapt to that. I still love the thing.

Stay away from the stock 6-cylinder version they had in 1967 - it was not a good engine. Most folks have swapped engines by now, so that shouldn't be a problem.

The Series IIIs I have driven had servo assist brakes and synchros in all gears. By then British Leyland was running Land Rover, and little quality issues crept up in some of the driveline components. By now the owners should have taken care of all those minor issues. Other than that, and some smogging of the engine, the Series IIIs are pretty similar to the IIAs. They both drive a bit more like trucks than the Defenders, but I doubt that would be a consideration to any true Land Rover owner.

If there have been engine, tranny, or any driveline swaps from the original components, you will have to check them out yourself. Some swaps were done very well, some not so well. Series trucks were notorious for breaking rear axle shafts once Leyland took over, so you might check to see if the axles have been upgraded. The basic frame and design are rock-solid, and not too disimilar from the Defenders except for the degree of creature comforts.
Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2007, 08:00 AM

Posts: n/a
I got to drive my buddy's III 88 earlier this week ... I forgot it had vacuum assisted brakes and the syncronized 1-2.

It's slow... noisy... the windshield is too short to see out of... there's less leg room than the 90 ... I can hardly wait to have my 109 back on the road
Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2007, 09:38 AM
cellulararrest's Avatar
Status: Offline
Chris Snyder
1994 D90 ST #614 | '95 RRC TWR
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Newburyport, MA
Posts: 1,532
Originally Posted by Monkeyboy
... there's less leg room than the 90 ...
Get an ex MOD . Military setup has more room. It really makes a difference.
Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2007, 09:43 AM

Posts: n/a
It's either my imagination or different seats ... or the MoD thing, but there's more room in my 109 than there is in my buddy's NAS 88.
Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2007, 10:27 AM
Status: Offline
Dave Morgan
74 SIII 109sw / 00 SII
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Catawba River basin
Posts: 25
I would not recommend a stock series rover as daily driver these days...... Not in that it's not do-able, for no-doubt there's folks out there still plugging away in them....But in reality they require regular attention in maintaining and in major metropolitan areas your at a well disadvantage in keeping up with the darting about of traffic....
Not that lack speediness or mechanical attention is a bad thing....... It just takes a certain temperament and mind-set for everyday sporting about..

Dave<----- newbe and SIII 109sw driver

Reply With Quote

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Defender Source > Non-Technical Discussions > Misc. Chit-Chat

109, series, series iii

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Odd, Rare, and heavy Series Stuff FS "NOS" SafariHP For Sale - Parts 8 May 12th, 2012 11:15 AM
Series IIa, III 24V belts jhobbs For Sale - Parts 0 December 26th, 2009 12:02 PM
67 Series IIA 109 5 Door C-Delta For Sale - Vehicles 1 August 10th, 2006 01:40 AM
1974 III Series 88 SW Prototype For Sale Nil For Sale - Vehicles 0 August 10th, 2005 01:39 PM
$100,000 LR Series III 1964 paulb Misc. Chit-Chat 5 September 15th, 2004 12:09 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 AM.